Nuclear & the Rise of 1, 2, and 3 GW Data Centers

Nuclear & the Rise of 1, 2, and 3 GW Data Centers

January 24, 202521 min read

A Deep Dive into a Transforming Industry

In the world of digital infrastructure, the data center is king. From streaming services to artificial intelligence (AI) to cloud computing, modern society depends on enormous data flows that are served, processed, and stored in data centers of all shapes and sizes. Over the past decade, we have witnessed the rapid growth of hyperscale data centers, each devouring tens—if not hundreds—of megawatts (MW) of power. Now, a newer and more audacious trend is on the horizon: campus designs that aim for power capacities in the range of 1, 2, and even 3 gigawatts (GW).

This gargantuan scaling of power demand has the potential to reshape regional grids, accelerate clean energy commitments, and push the envelope on what kinds of power sources can feasibly supply these digital behemoths. One energy source is emerging as especially intriguing for these gigawatt-scale data center facilities: nuclear power. Nuclear offers a combination of reliability, low emissions, and energy density—attributes that are in high demand for data centers seeking massive, round-the-clock power.

However, the journey to building nuclear-powered data centers—or indeed data centers of gigawatt scale in the first place—is rife with challenges, from public perception hurdles to regulatory complexities and immense capital expenditures. The reward, however, can be revolutionary. By leveraging advanced nuclear technologies, data center operators and their partners in the utility space may open up new pathways to meet exploding compute demands for AI, machine learning, and digital transformation—without driving up carbon emissions or straining already-loaded grids.

In this in-depth article, we will explore the rise of 1, 2, and 3 GW data centers, the drivers behind their development, and how nuclear power is emerging as a strong candidate to supply these megacampus facilities. We will also examine the challenges that data center operators, utilities, and the nuclear industry must tackle together, from public perceptions of nuclear waste and safety, to regulatory hurdles, to integrating advanced nuclear reactors like Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) into overall energy strategies. Our goal is to provide a comprehensive look at this critical convergence of digital infrastructure and nuclear power, offering insights into how this synergy may shape the future of both sectors.

1. A Brief History of Data Center Growth

Before we can understand the gravity of building data centers on the order of multiple gigawatts, it’s helpful to take a quick step back and trace the evolution of data centers. This will clarify how we have arrived at the doorstep of the “gigawatt era.”

1.1 Early Internet Age: Kilowatts to a Few Megawatts

In the 1990s and early 2000s, internet adoption soared, but most digital services were rudimentary compared to today’s standards. Websites were mostly text-based, and streaming media was practically non-existent. Data centers in that era were modest, typically requiring tens or hundreds of kilowatts, and occasionally crossing into a few MW.

1.2 The Virtualization and Cloud Boom

By the late 2000s and early 2010s, virtualization technologies allowed servers to be more efficiently utilized. This ushered in the “cloud era.” Companies like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, and Google began to build “hyperscale” data centers that could handle large multi-tenant workloads at scale. Data center designs moved into the tens of MW—30 MW or 50 MW—and some saw expansions to 100 MW or more as entire regions of the world shifted to cloud computing.

1.3 AI and the Next Compute-Intensive Frontier

Now, with artificial intelligence workloads exploding at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of nearly 48%, data center energy demand is once again being redefined. Large language models, image recognition algorithms, and advanced predictive analytics rely on high-power GPUs and specialized hardware. In some cases, these systems demand several times more electricity than typical CPU-based setups.

While a data center of 30–50 MW once seemed massive, the new horizon for AI-driven facilities may be measured in the hundreds of megawatts, culminating in multi-building campuses requiring 1–3 GW of electricity. This is the context in which leading tech giants are scouting land and forging massive power agreements that can accommodate such monumental demand.

2. The Emergence of Gigawatt-Scale Data Centers

2.1 Defining the Gigawatt Era

A gigawatt (GW) is 1,000 MW—a level of power typically associated with a medium-sized city or a large power plant. When we talk about 1, 2, or 3 GW of power for a single data center campus, we’re discussing enough electricity to run hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of homes. The plan for gigawatt-scale data centers is not merely an incremental step from the days of 30–50 MW facilities; it’s an order-of-magnitude leap in scale.

2.2 Drivers Behind Gigawatt Requirements

1. AI and Machine Learning: Training and operating advanced AI models require computing clusters that can draw tens of MW, and expansions are only accelerating.

2. Edge-Centric Workloads: As 5G and edge computing proliferate, the backend storage and processing for these real-time applications further increase data center footprints.

3. Hyperscale Cloud Providers: Tech titans like AWS, Microsoft, Google, and Meta continue to expand rapidly, offering an ever-growing range of services and hosting billions of users worldwide.

4. Data Sovereignty & Local Regulations: In some regions, data localization laws drive companies to build multiple large data centers within specific geographic jurisdictions, further ramping up total power demand.

2.3 Real-World Examples

• Microsoft has signed power purchase agreements indicating it might be planning data center clusters with power demands in the hundreds of megawatts—and that’s just in one region.

• Amazon Web Services (AWS) purchased 960 MW capacity from a nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania, hinting that it could build data centers or a data center campus approaching the 1 GW threshold.

• Meta has stated it might be involved with or investing in 1–4 GW of new nuclear generation capacity in the United States by the early 2030s, presumably for data center usage.

Though some of these announcements are forward-looking, they signal a clear trend: the pursuit of extremely large power capacities to serve next-generation digital workloads.

3. Why Nuclear? Exploring the Appeal of Nuclear Energy

3.1 Reliability and Baseload Power

Unlike solar and wind—both of which are intermittent energy sources—nuclear power provides steady baseload electricity around the clock. For data center operators, reliability is paramount. A single minute of downtime can cost millions of dollars, not to mention the potential damage to reputation and user trust. Nuclear plants often operate at capacity factors exceeding 90%, making them one of the most reliable energy sources on the grid. This aligns perfectly with the near-100% uptime demands of data centers.

3.2 Low Carbon Footprint

Nuclear power is notably low in greenhouse gas emissions once the plant is constructed and operational. This is especially appealing to tech giants that have pledged to reduce their carbon footprint. While solar and wind are also low-carbon, their intermittency often requires backup generation—commonly natural gas or large-scale battery storage—to firm up capacity. By contrast, nuclear can directly provide stable, carbon-free baseload power that aligns with corporate commitments to sustainability.

3.3 High Energy Density

Energy density refers to how much power can be generated from a certain amount of fuel. Nuclear is among the highest in energy density, meaning that a relatively small quantity of uranium can generate gigawatt-level power for extended periods. This characteristic makes nuclear particularly suitable for large, centralized power needs like multi-GW data centers. Wind and solar often require vast tracts of land to achieve comparable outputs, which may not be feasible near major tech hubs or in areas with high real estate costs.

3.4 Alignment with Existing Infrastructure

Many nuclear plants exist near robust transmission networks or are close to large metropolitan areas (where data center demand is high). Co-locating data centers next to nuclear facilities could simplify transmission logistics and reduce line losses. In some cases, older nuclear facilities with dormant units can be reactivated or refurbished with new technologies, giving data center operators a ready-made power source.

4. Recent Partnerships and Developments

4.1 Microsoft & Constellation Energy: Three Mile Island

Microsoft’s 20-year power purchase agreement to restart a reactor at Three Mile Island was a watershed moment for the industry. The storied history of Three Mile Island, which is synonymous with the 1979 partial meltdown, underscores both the challenges and opportunities of nuclear. Microsoft’s commitment signals a readiness to address negative perceptions through transparent communication, while also acknowledging nuclear’s strategic value as a zero-carbon, reliable power source.

4.2 AWS & Talen Energy

Amazon’s AWS formed a significant partnership by contracting 960 MW of capacity at the Susquehanna nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania. This arrangement indicates that AWS is not only comfortable tapping into nuclear power but may build or expand data center campuses directly adjacent to nuclear facilities for high-capacity, low-carbon power.

4.3 Meta’s Nuclear Ambitions

Meta (Facebook’s parent company) indicated an interest in adding between 1 and 4 GW of new nuclear generating capacity in the United States by the early 2030s. Though exact project details are still taking shape, Meta’s announcement underscores that the largest tech players see nuclear as a meaningful resource in their decarbonization toolkit.

4.4 Oklo and Switch

Perhaps one of the more futuristic collaborations involves Oklo, a Silicon Valley-based advanced nuclear reactor startup, and Switch, a well-known data center infrastructure company. Their deal to deploy as much as 12 GW of Oklo’s Aurora “powerhouses” by the mid-2040s exemplifies the promise of advanced reactors—especially microreactors and SMRs—that could be scaled to meet data center demand more flexibly than traditional large reactors.

5. Nuclear Technologies Shaping the Future of Data Centers

5.1 Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)

SMRs are often cited as a game-changer for nuclear energy. These reactors—ranging from 25 MW up to a few hundred MW—are factory-produced, modular, and can be deployed more quickly than traditional large reactors. For a data center requiring several hundred MW or more, one could install multiple SMR units. This modular approach reduces capital cost risks and construction timelines, while also allowing an operator to add capacity incrementally.

5.1.1 Advantages of SMRs

• Enhanced Safety: Many SMRs use passive cooling systems that do not rely on external power, reducing the risk of meltdown events.

• Scalability: Because each module is smaller, a data center operator could start with a couple of units and expand as demand grows.

• Distributed Placement: SMRs can fit in more locations compared to sprawling large reactors, making them flexible for data center siting.

5.2 Advanced Reactor Designs

Beyond SMRs, companies like TerraPower, X-energy, Kairos Power, and others are working on advanced reactor technologies. These reactors use different fuel forms and coolants, such as molten salts or high-temperature gas, potentially offering even higher efficiencies, better load-following capabilities, and reduced waste outputs. Data centers could benefit from these reactors’ quick-ramp operations (to some extent) when balancing supply and demand.

5.3 Microreactors

Microreactors are the next step down in capacity: from about 1 MW to tens of MW. Though they may not power a full-scale hyperscale data center on their own, they might be ideal for smaller edge data centers or remote facilities that need reliable, off-grid power. In some scenarios, multiple microreactors could operate in tandem, functioning as a distributed power system.

5.4 Hybrid Systems

Another area of innovation is combining nuclear power with other renewables to create hybrid energy systems. For instance, a data center might source a large chunk of its power from nuclear, while also tapping into solar or wind to offset some daytime or seasonal loads. In these scenarios, the nuclear plant can serve as the baseload anchor, ensuring reliability even when renewable generation fluctuates. This synergy may help maximize carbon-free energy usage around the clock.

6. Challenges and Potential Solutions

6.1 High Upfront Capital Costs

One of the toughest hurdles in building or refurbishing nuclear power plants is the high initial capital expenditure (CAPEX). Even an SMR, while cheaper than a full-scale reactor, can cost hundreds of millions to develop and deploy at scale. However, as nuclear technology matures and more modular approaches are adopted, costs are expected to fall. Furthermore, large tech companies with deep pockets and long-term planning horizons may be better equipped than many utilities to shoulder such costs, especially if it secures them a robust, zero-carbon power supply for decades.

6.2 Regulatory Complexities

Nuclear energy is among the most heavily regulated sectors in the world. Ensuring safety, security, and proper waste management demands multiple layers of oversight, permits, and reviews. For data center operators accustomed to rapidly building new facilities within 12–24 months, the multi-year timeline of nuclear approvals can be a culture shock. Addressing this reality requires close collaboration between tech companies, nuclear developers, regulators, and policymakers to streamline processes without compromising safety.

6.3 Public Perception and Opposition

The words “nuclear power” still elicit concerns tied to historical accidents such as Chernobyl and Fukushima, as well as long-term worries about radioactive waste. Public opposition can stall new reactor projects or re-licensing efforts for dormant plants. Tech companies venturing into nuclear must invest in community engagement, transparency, and education to demonstrate their commitment to safe, responsible operation. By highlighting advanced nuclear’s enhanced safety features, lower waste volumes, and the broader climate benefits, operators can address at least some of the fears in local and global communities.

6.4 Nuclear Waste Management

Despite the relatively small volume of spent nuclear fuel compared to emissions from fossil fuel plants, long-lived radioactive waste remains a contentious issue. Solutions range from deep geological repositories (e.g., Finland’s Onkalo facility) to reprocessing spent fuel into new reactor fuel. Advanced reactor designs may further reduce waste by using more of the fuel’s potential energy. Yet, public concerns persist. Tech companies collaborating with nuclear power must either partner with existing storage solutions or support new waste management infrastructure as part of their project planning.

6.5 Skilled Workforce Shortages

Nuclear plants require specialized expertise, from nuclear engineers to radiation safety officers. Meanwhile, data centers also need highly skilled professionals to operate sophisticated computing equipment. Finding or training a workforce capable of handling both nuclear systems and mission-critical IT infrastructure can be a bottleneck. Collaboration between academia, government, and private industry, plus robust training programs, will be essential in bridging this skills gap.

7. Grid Reliability: The Double-Edged Sword

7.1 Challenges to the Grid

Hosting a data center campus that demands 1–3 GW can be a significant stress test on local grids. Even if the data center is co-located with a large power plant, the transmission infrastructure must handle that draw or supply. If a data center is not directly next to the power plant, it can exacerbate congestion, risk of outages, and require massive grid upgrades. Utilities and regional transmission operators (RTOs) must plan for these large, concentrated loads carefully.

7.2 Opportunities for Grid Enhancement

On the flip side, large data centers can help fund or spur investment in modernizing grid infrastructure. By partnering with utilities, data centers can accelerate the integration of advanced technologies like dynamic line ratings, advanced power flow controls, and large-scale battery storage. There’s also the potential for demand response programs, where data centers shift certain workloads off-peak or throttle nonessential tasks in exchange for lower rates. This synergy can improve overall grid flexibility and reliability.

7.3 Nuclear + Data Centers = Grid Stability

Nuclear plants, providing consistent baseload power, can anchor local grids. When paired with data centers that also have uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems and backup generators, the entire regional grid might see improved resilience. For instance, if there’s a momentary shortfall in generation from renewables or other plants, the data center could temporarily adjust loads, or the nuclear plant could slightly ramp capacity (some advanced designs allow flexible operation). These complementary features can contribute to overall system reliability.

8. Environmental and Community Considerations

8.1 Carbon Footprint

Data centers already account for about 1–1.5% of global electricity usage, and as they scale to gigawatt levels, that fraction could grow. If powered by fossil fuels, these data centers would carry a significant carbon burden. Nuclear’s zero-carbon electricity generation helps keep these digital expansions in alignment with climate targets. The synergy is critical in a world increasingly driven by net-zero goals.

8.2 Water Usage

Nuclear plants—like many other thermal power stations—often use substantial water for cooling. In water-stressed regions, this can become a point of contention. However, advanced designs like certain SMRs and microreactors may use air-cooling or advanced heat transfer systems that dramatically reduce water usage. Data centers themselves are water-intensive for cooling, so co-locating them with power plants might enable advanced water reuse strategies, or a shift to different cooling methods that minimize overall consumption.

8.3 Land Use and Biodiversity

One underappreciated advantage of nuclear is its small land footprint per MWh of power generated. Large wind or solar farms can sprawl over thousands of acres, potentially affecting local habitats. A nuclear plant that supplies a multi-GW data center campus may require only a fraction of that land area. Yet, if the data center itself must be expansive, there may be environmental concerns about land conversion, depending on the site location. Balancing these elements—particularly in ecologically sensitive areas—is essential.

8.4 Community Impact and Engagement

Large infrastructure projects can impose noise, construction traffic, and other disruptions on local communities. Additionally, nuclear facilities come with heightened security and emergency planning zones. Operators must engage communities early and often, ensuring that local residents understand the project’s scope, benefits, and safety measures. Such engagement can include job creation strategies, local tax benefits, infrastructure improvements, and other community enhancements to ensure a mutually beneficial relationship.

9. Comparing Nuclear to Other Low-Carbon Options

9.1 Nuclear vs. Renewables (Wind, Solar)

While wind and solar power have seen tremendous cost declines, they are intermittent and often require large footprints to reach gigawatt-level generation. Storage solutions like batteries help, but scaling storage to multi-GW data centers can be prohibitively expensive. Nuclear’s advantage is its baseload characteristic, high capacity factor, and small land footprint. However, renewables have minimal waste issues, face fewer regulatory hurdles, and are often more popular publicly. A hybrid approach—pairing nuclear baseload with solar or wind to offset peak demands—can yield an optimal blend.

9.2 Nuclear vs. Fossil Fuels

Historically, data centers have relied on coal or natural gas for reliable electricity. While these sources are dispatchable, they produce large volumes of CO2, driving the climate crisis. Natural gas has often been used to balance wind and solar, but that still comes with carbon emissions. Nuclear eliminates direct CO2 emissions and can help data centers meet sustainability targets that are impossible to achieve with fossil fuels alone.

9.3 Long-Term Costs

Nuclear power stations can have high initial construction costs but typically enjoy lower operational costs over a plant life of 40–60 years or more. Wind and solar can have lower CAPEX but may need frequent expansions or battery storage replacements. Over the long term, nuclear’s cost per kilowatt-hour may be competitive or even cheaper, especially when factoring in carbon pricing or corporate carbon goals.

10. Case Studies in Nuclear-Powered Data Centers

10.1 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station & AWS

In Pennsylvania, Amazon’s AWS has a deal for 960 MW of nuclear capacity from Talen Energy’s Susquehanna nuclear plant. Plans involve a data center campus adjacent to the reactor complex, minimizing transmission losses. This arrangement underscores how an existing nuclear asset can be leveraged for large-scale, zero-carbon data center power. While not all details are public, it marks one of the largest public commitments between a nuclear asset and a hyperscale cloud provider.

10.2 Three Mile Island Restart & Microsoft

Another Pennsylvania example is Microsoft’s pledge to finance the restart of a previously shuttered unit at Three Mile Island. Despite the site’s historical baggage, the potential synergy is clear: The facility can provide hundreds of MW of secure, emission-free power. By locking in a 20-year agreement, Microsoft ensures predictability in its energy costs and supply, potentially far exceeding what is achievable with short-term power purchase agreements in a volatile energy market.

10.3 Cumulus Data Near Nuclear

In addition to tech giants, specialized data center providers like Cumulus Data have begun building shells directly connected to nuclear facilities. A planned 48 MW data center campus near the Susquehanna plant is set to expand to 475 MW total capacity, highlighting the viability of a “plug-and-play” approach next to an established reactor site. Bitcoin mining operations (TeraWulf) have also moved in, showing broader appetite for low-carbon baseload power beyond typical enterprise data workloads.

11. The Future: Opportunities and Outlook

11.1 AI-Driven Demand

AI is driving data center growth at an unprecedented pace. Training large language models, image recognition tasks, self-driving car algorithms, and real-time analytics all require more computational horsepower than standard cloud workloads. If the new generation of AI hardware is orders of magnitude more power-hungry, then gigawatt-scale data centers may become routine among hyperscalers—and nuclear might become even more critical to meet that demand sustainably.

11.2 Potential for Advanced Nuclear Integration

As advanced nuclear reactor designs mature, we could see data center campuses built around multiple SMRs or microreactors, each dedicated to a segment of operations. This modular design allows for incremental expansion and potential load-following capabilities. Once proven, such designs may become blueprint projects that can be replicated worldwide, especially in regions lacking robust existing power grids.

11.3 Hybrid and Flexible Systems

In addition to pairing nuclear with renewables, future data centers could incorporate other forms of clean energy, including geothermal or hydrogen-based systems, to create truly integrated zero-carbon microgrids. Nuclear’s role as a stable anchor resource would help balance the variability of renewable sources, while also providing enough capacity to run water-intensive cooling systems that advanced AI servers may need.

11.4 Data Center Heat Utilization

Another future avenue is harnessing waste heat from nuclear plants or advanced reactors to directly assist in data center cooling. Although it might sound paradoxical (since data centers also generate heat), some advanced reactor concepts use molten salts or high-temperature gas. The synergy between nuclear heat and advanced data center cooling approaches is still speculative but could unlock efficiencies if carefully engineered.

11.5 Regulatory Evolution

If data centers and tech giants start advocating for faster, more transparent regulatory pathways for advanced nuclear, governments may respond by streamlining licensing processes. Public perception—long a barrier for nuclear—may also shift if the largest and most respected tech brands champion nuclear as a climate solution that aligns with corporate social responsibility commitments.

12. Confronting Public Perception and Waste Management

Public acceptance remains a major determinant in the expansion of nuclear-powered data centers. While advanced reactors can mitigate concerns through better safety features and minimized waste, the legacy issues persist:

• Nuclear Waste: Even if volumes are smaller than many realize, the longevity of radioactivity must be managed. Solutions include deep geological repositories, reprocessing, and new reactor designs that reuse spent fuel.

• Historical Incidents: Public memory of Chernobyl, Fukushima, and Three Mile Island fosters skepticism. Data center operators and reactor developers must demonstrate that modern designs are inherently safer, with multiple passive barriers and strong oversight.

• Transparency and Community Engagement: Engaging local residents in the planning process, sharing details about safety measures, and articulating the environmental benefits can help shift opinions. The tech sector’s robust brand trust might be an advantage in persuading the public that nuclear can be safe and climate-friendly.

Ultimately, robust waste management strategies and transparent operations are the keys to ensuring the public that these gigawatt-scale data centers powered by nuclear are beneficial, not threatening, to community well-being and environmental stewardship.

13. Conclusion: A New Frontier for Data Centers and Nuclear Power

The rise of 1, 2, and 3 GW data centers marks a tipping point in how we power the digital economy. AI, cloud computing, and the constant proliferation of data-hungry services are pushing the boundaries of conventional data center design—and the energy industry as a whole. For these massive compute campuses to be both sustainable and reliable, nuclear power is emerging as a key part of the puzzle.

Nuclear’s attributes—high-capacity baseload power, near-zero greenhouse gas emissions, small land footprint, and potential for advanced reactor technologies—make it an attractive alternative to fossil fuels. Indeed, many of the world’s leading tech companies, including Microsoft, AWS, Meta, and others, are already investing heavily in nuclear partnerships. As costs come down and advanced designs mature, smaller and more flexible nuclear plants (SMRs, microreactors) could revolutionize how data centers tap into local power grids or even generate power onsite.

That said, a future where gigawatt-scale data centers are commonplace and nuclear is widely adopted to power them depends on overcoming formidable challenges. Public perception, nuclear waste management, regulatory timelines, and steep initial capital outlays all loom large. Overcoming these obstacles will require transparent engagement, technological innovation, policy reforms, and a shared recognition that to power the next stage of the digital revolution sustainably, we need nuclear in the mix.

The stakes are high. As the global community strives to limit temperature rise and achieve net-zero emissions, the data center industry sits at the intersection of technology and energy—one that is poised to shape the trajectory of both. Embracing nuclear power at the multi-gigawatt scale could help realize a future where AI, cloud computing, and immersive digital experiences flourish without accelerating climate change. If successful, these projects may become the model for how societies worldwide reconcile surging digital demands with urgent environmental imperatives.

In short, the path forward is a bold one, but also ripe with opportunity. By uniting data center operators, nuclear technology pioneers, regulators, and local communities, a generation of gigawatt-scale data centers powered by nuclear could set a new gold standard—an era of clean, reliable, large-scale digital infrastructure that pushes the boundaries of innovation while safeguarding the planet we call home.

Final Thoughts

If you want to talk over your options, click here to schedule a time to chat with our Principal Joe MacDonald see how we can help you revolutionize global project development, management, and delivery

Joe MacDonald, founder of Urban A&O, merges academic insight with forward-thinking design at the intersection of architecture, sustainability, and public engagement. 

An Associate Professor at Harvard Graduate School of Design and a principal at Urban A&O, MacDonald's practice is known for pushing the boundaries of parametric modeling and digital fabrication. 

His award-winning work, such as the Steinhart Aquarium's Water Planet at the California Academy of Sciences, exemplifies his talent for sculpting environments that integrate ecological principles with innovative design. 

With projects ranging from interactive museum installations to Carbon-Neutral Data Centers and urban development plans, MacDonald continues to advance architectural solutions that respond to the evolving challenges of climate change, resilience, and urban density worldwide. 

His work has garnered recognition in top publications like Time Magazine, The New York Times, and Metropolis Magazine.

Joe MacDonald

Joe MacDonald, founder of Urban A&O, merges academic insight with forward-thinking design at the intersection of architecture, sustainability, and public engagement. An Associate Professor at Harvard Graduate School of Design and a principal at Urban A&O, MacDonald's practice is known for pushing the boundaries of parametric modeling and digital fabrication. His award-winning work, such as the Steinhart Aquarium's Water Planet at the California Academy of Sciences, exemplifies his talent for sculpting environments that integrate ecological principles with innovative design. With projects ranging from interactive museum installations to Carbon-Neutral Data Centers and urban development plans, MacDonald continues to advance architectural solutions that respond to the evolving challenges of climate change, resilience, and urban density worldwide. His work has garnered recognition in top publications like Time Magazine, The New York Times, and Metropolis Magazine.

Back to Blog

Office: Brooklyn, NY 11201 

Call:  +1-347-633-2994

Copyright 2024 . All rights reserved